History and Current
Status of Systematic Research with Araceae
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas B. Croat
Missouri Botanical Garden
P. O. Box 299
St. Louis, MO 63166
USA
Note: This paper, originally published in Aroideana Vol. 21, pp. 26-145 in 1998, is periodically updated on the IAS Web site with current additions. Any mistakes, proposed changes, or new publications that deal with the systematics of Araceae should be brought to my attention. Mail me at the address listed above, or E-mail me at here. The following Web page version was published in 2000. The recently updated version last revised on November 1, 2002, is available as a Microsoft Word document (736 Kb) here, and as a PDF file (929 Kb) here. Adobe Acrobat Reader, a free software, is required to view this PDF file.
Introduction
The history of systematic
work with Araceae has been previously covered by Nicolson (1987b),
and was the subject of a chapter in the Genera of Araceae
by Mayo, Bogner & Boyce (1997) and in Curtis's Botanical
Magazine new series (Mayo et al., 1995). In addition
to covering many of the principal players in the field of aroid
research, Nicolson's paper dealt with the evolution of family
concepts and gave a comparison of the then current modern systems
of classification. The papers by Mayo, Bogner and Boyce were more
comprehensive in scope than that of Nicolson but still did not
cover in great detail many of the participants in Araceae research.
In contrast, this paper will cover all systematic and floristic
work that deals with Araceae which is known to me. It will not,
in general, deal with agronomic papers on Araceae such as the
rich literature on taro and its cultivation, nor will it deal
with smaller papers of a technical nature or those dealing with
pollination biology. It will include review papers on technical
subjects and all works, regardless of their nature, of current
aroid researchers. It is hoped that other reviews will be forthcoming
which will cover separately the technical papers dealing with
anatomy, cytology, physiology, palenology and other areas, and
that still another review will be published on the subject of
pollination biology of Araceae and the rich literature dealing
with thermogenesis.
Among the earliest papers
featuring what are now called Araceae were those by L. Fuchs (1542)
and John Ray (1682) who were among the first to fully describe
plants of Araceae as well as those by Dodoens (1557) who described
and illustrated several European species in Arum, Arisarum
and Dracunculus (also featuring Calla palustris
under the name Dracunculus palustris). Though these works
often had aroid clustered together and thus understood the familial
concept it was left to later works, especially Tournefort (1700)
and Jussieu (1789) to define the Araceae in formal terms.
Carl Linnaeus, the father
of binomial classification, can hardly be considered an aroid
specialist, but since his system laid the groundwork for all subsequent
work he must be recognized. His (1753) Species Plantarum
treated only 26 of the more than 3500 species of Araceae currently
estimated for the family, and these were placed in four genera:
Arum, Dracontium, Calla, and Pothos.
In Genera Plantarum (Linnaeus, 1754) he added the genus
Pistia. By the time of his second edition of Species
Plantarum (1763) he had recognized 36 species.
|